Betekenis van:
judgment day

judgment day
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • laatste dag v.e. evenement
  • (New Testament) day at the end of time following Armageddon when God will decree the fates of all individual humans according to the good and evil of their earthly lives

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

judgment day
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • doemdag, doemsdag
  • (New Testament) day at the end of time following Armageddon when God will decree the fates of all individual humans according to the good and evil of their earthly lives

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

judgment day
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • bijltjesdag
  • (New Testament) day at the end of time following Armageddon when God will decree the fates of all individual humans according to the good and evil of their earthly lives

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

judgment day
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • oordeelsdag, dies irae
  • (New Testament) day at the end of time following Armageddon when God will decree the fates of all individual humans according to the good and evil of their earthly lives

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen


Voorbeeldzinnen

  1. The day of judgment has come.
  2. The day of judgment has arrived.
  3. Atheists will get their comeuppance on Judgment Day.
  4. Have you already read the book "Judgment Day Began Long Ago"?
  5. For the same reasons it is necessary to do so with effect from the day following the judgment of the Court of Justice, namely 12 July 2006.
  6. He went on to state that ‘the effects of renewals made pursuant to this order shall not extend beyond the day on which judgment is given in the main action.’
  7. As the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance of the European Communities have ruled, operating aid, i.e. aid intended to relieve an undertaking of the expenses which it would itself normally have had to bear in its day-to-day management or its usual activities, in principle distorts competition (judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-459/93 Siemens SA v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, paragraphs 48 and 77 and the case law cited therein).
  8. However, regarding the method for calculating the interest, the Court of Justice, in its judgment of 11 December 2008 in Case C-295/07, Commission v Département du Loiret and Scott SA [28], stated that the method for calculating the present-day value of unlawful aid is a substantive and not a procedural matter [29].
  9. By order of 26 June 2003 [8], the President of the Court suspended the operation of Decision 2003/757/EC ‘inasmuch as it prohibits the Kingdom of Belgium from renewing coordination centre authorisations effective at the date of notification of the decision.’ He went on to state that ‘the effects of renewals made pursuant to this order shall not extend beyond the day on which judgment is given in the main action.’
  10. By its judgment of 22 June 2006 [10], the Court annulled in part the Commission decision ‘insofar as it does not lay down transitional measures for those coordination centres with an application for renewal of their authorisation pending on the date on which the contested decision was notified or with an authorisation which expired at the same time or shortly after the notification of the decision.’ That same day it also annulled Decision 2003/531/EC [11].
  11. The Court ended by charging the whole of the debtor communes’ debt to the State: ‘In view of the above, the Court holds that it is for the defendant state to pay the applicants or, if appropriate, their legal successors the sums (including interest) due to them as from the delivery, on 10 July 1992, of the judgments of the Bastia administrative tribunal (ibidem) until the day on which this judgment has been given’.